POLÍTICAS DE INOVAÇÃO EFETIVAS: delimitando uma estrutura básica de desenho
Resumo
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ANADÓN, Laura Díaz. Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 10, p. 1742–1756, 2012.
BARDIN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.
BORRÁS, Susana; EDQUIST, Charles. The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, [S. l.], v. 80, n. 8, p. 1513–1522, 2013.
CANTNER, Uwe; GRAF, Holger; HERRMANN, Johannes; KALTHAUS, Martin. Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 6, p. 1165–1184, 2016.
CASA CIVIL DA PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Avaliação de políticas públicas : guia prático de análise ex ante. Brasília: Ipea, 2018.
CERETTA, Gilberto Francisco; REIS, Dálcio Roberto Dos; ROCHA, Adilson Carlos Da. Inovação e modelos de negócio: um estudo bibliométrico da produção científica na base Web of Science. Gestão & Produção, [S. l.], v. 23, p. 433–444, 2016.
COSTANTINI, Valeria; CRESPI, Francesco; PALMA, Alessandro. Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 4, p. 799–819, 2017.
EDMONDSON, Duncan L.; KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline S. The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103555, 2019.
EDMONDSON, Duncan L.; ROGGE, Karoline S.; KERN, Florian. Zero carbon homes in the UK? Analysing the co-evolution of policy mix and socio-technical system. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, [S. l.], v. 35, p. 135–161, 2020.
FALCONE, Pasquale Marcello; LOPOLITO, Antonio; SICA, Edgardo. Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [S. l.], v. 148, p. 119706, 2019.
FLANAGAN, Kieron; UYARRA, Elvira; LARANJA, Manuel. Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 5, p. 702–713, 2011.
FOXON, Timothy J. A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological economics, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 12, p. 2258–2267, 2011.
GUERZONI, Marco; RAITERI, Emilio. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 44, n. 3, p. 726–747, 2015.
HOPPMANN, Joern; PETERS, Michael; SCHNEIDER, Malte; HOFFMANN, Volker H. The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 42, n. 4, p. 989–1003, 2013.
HOWLETT, Michael; LEJANO, Raul P. Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. 357–381, 2012.
IBGE. Pesquisa de Inovação 2017-PINTEC. Brasília.
IMBERT, Enrica; LADU, Luana; MORONE, Piergiuseppe; QUITZOW, Rainer. Comparing policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: The case of Italy and Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, [S. l.], v. 33, p. 70–81, 2017.
INGRAM, Helen; SCHNEIDER, Anne Larason. Policy analysis for democracy. Em: MORAN, Michael; REIN, Martin; GOODIN, Robert E. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 169–189.
JANNUZZI, Paulo Ma. Eficiência econômica, eficácia procedural ou efetividade social: três valores em disputa na avaliação de políticas e programas sociais. Desenvolvimento em Debate, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 117–142, 2016.
KANGER, Laur; SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.; NOORKÕIV, Martin. Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 49, n. 7, p. 104072, 2020.
KEMP, René; PONTOGLIO, Serena. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological economics, [S. l.], v. 72, p. 28–36, 2011.
KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline S.; HOWLETT, Michael. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103832, 2019.
KIVIMAA, Paula; KERN, Florian. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 1, p. 205–217, 2016.
KOGA, Natália Massaco; PALOTTI, Pedro Lucas de Moura; MELLO, Janine; PINHEIRO, Maurício Mota Saboya. Políticas públicas e usos de evidências no Brasil: conceitos, métodos, contextos e práticas. [S. l.], 2022.
LEAL, Carlos Ivan Simonsen; FIGUEIREDO, Paulo N. Inovação tecnológica no Brasil: desafios e insumos para políticas públicas. Revista de Administração Pública, [S. l.], v. 55, p. 512–537, 2021.
LINDER, Stephen H.; PETERS, B. Guy. Research perspectives on the design of public policy: implementation, formulation, and design. Em: PALUMBO, Dennis J.; CALISTA, Donald J. (org.). Implementation and the policy process: opening up the black box. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990. p. 51–66.
OLIVEIRA, Fernanda Stringassi De; BONACELLI, Maria Beatriz Machado. Low efficiency in the use of research and development resources in brazilian public research organizations: causal chains analysis. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), [S. l.], v. 25, p. 62–95, 2019.
PETERS, B. Guy; CAPANO, Giliberto; HOWLETT, Michael; MUKHERJEE, Ishani; CHOU, Meng-Hsuan; RAVINET, Pauline. Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
PLONSKI, Guilherme Ary. Bases para um movimento pela inovação tecnológica no Brasil. São Paulo em perspectiva, [S. l.], v. 19, p. 25–33, 2005.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; REICHARDT, Kristin. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 8, p. 1620–1635, 2016.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; SCHLEICH, Joachim. Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 9, p. 1639–1654, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; SCHNEIDER, Malte; HOFFMANN, Volker H. The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System—Findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecological Economics, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 3, p. 513–523, 2011.
ROSENOW, Jan; KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline. The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: The case of energy efficiency policy. Energy Research and Social Science, [S. l.], v. 33, p. 95–104, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.013.
SALERMO, Maria Sergio; KUBOTA, Luis Claudio. Estado e Inovação. Em: NEGRI, João Alberto De; KUBOTA, Luis Claudio (org.). Políticas de Incentivo à Inovação Tecnológica no Brasil. Brasília: IPEA, 2008. p. 13–66.
SCHMIDT, Tobias S.; SEWERIN, Sebastian. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes–An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103557, 2019.
SCHOT, Johan; STEINMUELLER, W. Edward. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 9, p. 1554–1567, 2018.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.
TROTTER, Philipp A.; BROPHY, Aoife. Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in six sub-Saharan African countries. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 51, n. 6, p. 104528, 2022.
UYARRA, Elvira; SHAPIRA, Philip; HARDING, Alan. Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: Challenges of a place-blind policy mix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [S. l.], v. 103, p. 264–272, 2016.
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2024 Luciana Leite Lima, Rafael Barbosa de Aguiar, Lizandro Lui, Ana Victória Benvilaqua Comin
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
| Revista Estudos de Planejamento | ISSN 2595-9018 |