POLÍTICAS DE INOVAÇÃO EFETIVAS: delimitando uma estrutura básica de desenho
Resumo
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ANADÓN, Laura Díaz. Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 10, p. 1742–1756, 2012.
BARDIN, Lawrence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.
BORRÁS, Susana; EDQUIST, Charles. The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, [S. l.], v. 80, n. 8, p. 1513–1522, 2013.
CANTNER, Uwe; GRAF, Holger; HERRMANN, Johannes; KALTHAUS, Martin. Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 6, p. 1165–1184, 2016.
CASA CIVIL DA PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Avaliação de políticas públicas : guia prático de análise ex ante. Brasília: Ipea, 2018.
CERETTA, Gilberto Francisco; REIS, Dálcio Roberto Dos; ROCHA, Adilson Carlos Da. Inovação e modelos de negócio: um estudo bibliométrico da produção científica na base Web of Science. Gestão & Produção, [S. l.], v. 23, p. 433–444, 2016.
COSTANTINI, Valeria; CRESPI, Francesco; PALMA, Alessandro. Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 4, p. 799–819, 2017.
EDMONDSON, Duncan L.; KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline S. The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103555, 2019.
EDMONDSON, Duncan L.; ROGGE, Karoline S.; KERN, Florian. Zero carbon homes in the UK? Analysing the co-evolution of policy mix and socio-technical system. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, [S. l.], v. 35, p. 135–161, 2020.
FALCONE, Pasquale Marcello; LOPOLITO, Antonio; SICA, Edgardo. Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [S. l.], v. 148, p. 119706, 2019.
FLANAGAN, Kieron; UYARRA, Elvira; LARANJA, Manuel. Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 5, p. 702–713, 2011.
FOXON, Timothy J. A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological economics, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 12, p. 2258–2267, 2011.
GUERZONI, Marco; RAITERI, Emilio. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 44, n. 3, p. 726–747, 2015.
HOPPMANN, Joern; PETERS, Michael; SCHNEIDER, Malte; HOFFMANN, Volker H. The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 42, n. 4, p. 989–1003, 2013.
HOWLETT, Michael; LEJANO, Raul P. Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. 357–381, 2012.
IBGE. Pesquisa de Inovação 2017-PINTEC. Brasília.
IMBERT, Enrica; LADU, Luana; MORONE, Piergiuseppe; QUITZOW, Rainer. Comparing policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: The case of Italy and Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, [S. l.], v. 33, p. 70–81, 2017.
INGRAM, Helen; SCHNEIDER, Anne Larason. Policy analysis for democracy. Em: MORAN, Michael; REIN, Martin; GOODIN, Robert E. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 169–189.
JANNUZZI, Paulo Ma. Eficiência econômica, eficácia procedural ou efetividade social: três valores em disputa na avaliação de políticas e programas sociais. Desenvolvimento em Debate, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 117–142, 2016.
KANGER, Laur; SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.; NOORKÕIV, Martin. Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 49, n. 7, p. 104072, 2020.
KEMP, René; PONTOGLIO, Serena. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological economics, [S. l.], v. 72, p. 28–36, 2011.
KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline S.; HOWLETT, Michael. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103832, 2019.
KIVIMAA, Paula; KERN, Florian. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 1, p. 205–217, 2016.
KOGA, Natália Massaco; PALOTTI, Pedro Lucas de Moura; MELLO, Janine; PINHEIRO, Maurício Mota Saboya. Políticas públicas e usos de evidências no Brasil: conceitos, métodos, contextos e práticas. [S. l.], 2022.
LEAL, Carlos Ivan Simonsen; FIGUEIREDO, Paulo N. Inovação tecnológica no Brasil: desafios e insumos para políticas públicas. Revista de Administração Pública, [S. l.], v. 55, p. 512–537, 2021.
LINDER, Stephen H.; PETERS, B. Guy. Research perspectives on the design of public policy: implementation, formulation, and design. Em: PALUMBO, Dennis J.; CALISTA, Donald J. (org.). Implementation and the policy process: opening up the black box. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990. p. 51–66.
OLIVEIRA, Fernanda Stringassi De; BONACELLI, Maria Beatriz Machado. Low efficiency in the use of research and development resources in brazilian public research organizations: causal chains analysis. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), [S. l.], v. 25, p. 62–95, 2019.
PETERS, B. Guy; CAPANO, Giliberto; HOWLETT, Michael; MUKHERJEE, Ishani; CHOU, Meng-Hsuan; RAVINET, Pauline. Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
PLONSKI, Guilherme Ary. Bases para um movimento pela inovação tecnológica no Brasil. São Paulo em perspectiva, [S. l.], v. 19, p. 25–33, 2005.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; REICHARDT, Kristin. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 8, p. 1620–1635, 2016.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; SCHLEICH, Joachim. Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 9, p. 1639–1654, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011.
ROGGE, Karoline S.; SCHNEIDER, Malte; HOFFMANN, Volker H. The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System—Findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecological Economics, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 3, p. 513–523, 2011.
ROSENOW, Jan; KERN, Florian; ROGGE, Karoline. The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: The case of energy efficiency policy. Energy Research and Social Science, [S. l.], v. 33, p. 95–104, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.013.
SALERMO, Maria Sergio; KUBOTA, Luis Claudio. Estado e Inovação. Em: NEGRI, João Alberto De; KUBOTA, Luis Claudio (org.). Políticas de Incentivo à Inovação Tecnológica no Brasil. Brasília: IPEA, 2008. p. 13–66.
SCHMIDT, Tobias S.; SEWERIN, Sebastian. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes–An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 48, n. 10, p. 103557, 2019.
SCHOT, Johan; STEINMUELLER, W. Edward. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research policy, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 9, p. 1554–1567, 2018.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.
TROTTER, Philipp A.; BROPHY, Aoife. Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in six sub-Saharan African countries. Research Policy, [S. l.], v. 51, n. 6, p. 104528, 2022.
UYARRA, Elvira; SHAPIRA, Philip; HARDING, Alan. Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: Challenges of a place-blind policy mix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [S. l.], v. 103, p. 264–272, 2016.
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2024 Luciana Leite Lima, Rafael Barbosa de Aguiar, Lizandro Lui, Ana Victória Benvilaqua Comin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Licença Creative Commons"
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
| Revista Estudos de Planejamento | Secretaria de Planejamento, Governança e Gestão - RS | ISSN 2595-9018 |